review ¶ Continental Divide: Heidegger Cassirer Davos ñ PDF eBook or Kindle ePUB

Free download Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos

review ¶ Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos ñ PDF, eBook or Kindle ePUB ´ ➼ [Reading] ➾ Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos By Peter E. Gordon ➱ – Eyltransferservices.co.uk In the spring of 1929 Martin Heidegger and Ernst Cassirer met for Llion that touched all of the major philosophical movements of the day―life Divide Heidegger Cassirer ePUB #8608 philosophy philosophical anthropology neo Kantianism phenomenology and existentialism As Gordon explains the Davos debate would continue to both inspire and provoke well after the two men had gone their separate ways It remains even today a touchstone of philosophical memoryThis clear riveting book will be of great interest not only to philosophers and to historians of philosophy but also to anyone interested in the great intellectual ferment of Europe’s interwar yea. ExtraordinaryThis book has many many virtues1 It is a clear exposition of the elements of the Davos debate between Cassirer and Heidegger From this you can get a real sense of what it is like for two masters of philosophy to expound and argue Philosophy students would learn a lot about how to argue2 The event throws a powerful light on the tensions in Weimar Culture and the text covers them in exemplary fashion3 The erudition of both philosophers shines through the whole debate centers around the interpretation of Kant's Critiue of Pure Reason which both men have at their fingertips4 Gordon makes very clear what is at stake between the two interpretations and the world views of Cassirer and Heidegger He is very very judicious between the two It is not a hatchet job on either man rather the reader comes away deeply impressed by both figures and their committments5 Gordon is an excellent writer I am in awe of his capacity to navigate through both the narrative and the philosophical arguments

Peter E. Gordon » 6 Free read

Ical Peter Gordon reexamines the conversation Continental Divide PDFEPUB or its origins and its aftermath resuscitating an event that has become entombed in its own mythology Through a close and painstaking analysis Gordon dissects the exchange itself to reveal that it was at core a philosophical disagreement over what it means to be human But Gordon also shows how the life and work of these two philosophers remained closely intertwined Their disagreement can be understood only if we appreciate their common point of departure as thinkers of the German interwar crisis an era of rebe. Continental Divide is a fine book both as intellectual history and as philosophy It centers around the famous debate between Martin Heidegger and Ernst Cassirer at Davos in 1928 Davos has come down a bit in intellectually since then Cassirer Heidegger et al have been replaced by bond brokers and Bono The topic of the debate was about the interpretation of Kant's First Critiue but it had implications concerning philosophical method in general enlightenment rationalism versus irrationalism and parliamentary liberalism versus anti democratic nationalism in Germany The time of the debate was that of the late Weimar Republic in Germany when the democratic experiment of the twenties was beginning to unravel soon to completely collapse and be replaced by Hitler's Nazism in the depression Heidegger would not actually join the Nazis until five years later but in retrospect the debate was seen as a prelude to the collapse of liberal rationalism into the maelstrom of Nazism It also is seen on the level of pure philosophy as the triumph of philosophy of life and existentialism in Europe over conceptual logical approaches to method In fact the emigration of the Vienna Circle logical positivists after the murder of their leader Schlick the death of many Polish logicians in the holocaust and the death of the minority of French logicians in the resistance while Sartre avoided risk but later portrayed himself as a warrior of the resistance also contributed to the decline of logical and linguistic approaches on the contintentMany on the next generation of European philosophers were interested spectators at the debate Others falsely claimed or misremembered that they were present Gordon unfortunately does not attempt a complete list A few who claimed to be or were present such as Sohn Rethel are not noted by Gordon Even those who were not personally present such as Leo Strauss referred to the debate as exemplifying the collapse of liberalismGordon mentions some extraordinary events at Davos surrounding the debate One is a mock debate by the students Levinas then an uncritical partisan of Heidegger doubts rose after the latter's allegiance to Nazism played the part of Cassirer because of his bushy hairdo whitened with flour for the occasion The most amazing thing about this incident was that Cassirer and Heidegger themselves were in the audience of the student satire of the debate One wonders what they thought of itGordon not only traces the historical and political reverberations of the debate He also makes astute philosophical remarks about the actual positions of the debaters One point he develops in detail is the issue of transition between mythic conceptions of space and the mathematical physical conception of space Cassirer developed this issue in detail in his Philosophy of Symbolic Forms The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms Volume 2 Mythical Thought Philosophy of Symbolic Forms Mythical Thought but Gordon rightly claims accounting for this transition was problematical for HeideggerOverall this is an exemplary work both in history and in philosophy

Download ✓ PDF, eBook or Kindle ePUB » Peter E. Gordon

Continental Divide Heidegger Cassirer DavosIn the spring of Heidegger Cassirer PDFEPUB #228Martin Heidegger and Ernst Cassirer met for a public conversation in Davos Switzerland They were arguably the most important thinkers in Europe and their exchange touched upon the most urgent uestions in the history of philosophy What is human finitude What is objectivity What is culture What is truth Over the last eighty years the Davos encounter has acuired an allegorical significance as if it marked an ultimate and irreparable rupture in twentieth century Continental thought Here in a reconstruction at once historical and philosoph. In March 1929 philosophers Martin Heidegger 1889 1976 and Ernst Cassirer 1874 1945 met in Davos Switzerland for a public series of individual lectures and for a discussion and debate The Davos meeting has assumed an important near legendary stature in the history of Continental philosophy In his book Continental Divide Heidegger Cassirer Davos 2010 Peter Gordon gives an account of the the two philosophical protagonists their Davos meeting and of what proceeded and followed the Davos meeting Most importantly Gordon discusses what was and what was not at stake in the discussion between Cassirer and Heidegger The book displays a rare combination of historical and philosophical insight Gordon is Amabel B James Professor of History and Harvard College Professor Harvard University Recently issued in paperback his book won the Jacues Barzun Prize of the American Philosophical SocietyAt the time of their Davos meeting Cassirer and Heidegger were renowned The older philosopher Cassirer was an urbane German Jewish philosopher and a neo Kantian who had written extensively on the history of philosophy including a three volume statement of his own philosophical approach The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms Heidegger was born in rural Germany to a family of modest means and saw himself as an outsider Before the Davos debate Heidegger and published only one book but it was extraordinary and made him famous The bookBeing and Time 1927 has become a classic of philosophical literature In their Davos debate Cassirer and Heidegger explored the issues that divided them and also tried to see the extent to which they shared common groundAs did contemporaries to the debate Gordon compares the discussion to the conversations between Naptha and Settembrini for the heart of Hans Castorp in Thomas Mann's novel The Magic Mountain Mann's philosophical novel also was set in Davos Gordon sees the debate as revolving broadly around a uestion posed by Kant what is man Gordon finds the debate between Cassirer and Heidegger turned on what he termed two competing images of humanity each of which derived in part from Kant Cassirer's position derived from what Gordon terms spontaneity the ability of the human mind to shape reality and to create meaning in science culture ethics and other forms of endeavor Heidegger's thought turned on what the philosoper termed thrownness or receptivity It described man as a finite recipient of the world and of conditions which human beings do not control Human being in the world is historical with no philosophical grounding Heidegger's thought began with religious uestions although it abandoned religion Cassirer's began with science and proceeded outward particularly to ethics Gordon's book explores and develops these complex difficult themes in the Davos debate and in what proceeded and followed the debateThe heart of the book is in the third and fourth chapters In the former chapter Gordon discusses the individual lectures that Cassirer and Heidegger presented at Davos Somewhat paradoxically Cassirer lectured on philosophical anthropology a subject with some ties to Heidegger while Heidegger lectured on Kant Cassier's specialty and offered a tortured reading of Kant's thought which Heidegger himself ultimately abandoned In the pivotal fourth chapter Gordon gives the text of the debate between Cassirer and Heidegger together with Gordon's own extended commentary and analysis of virtually every passageGordon's book shows great erudition about German philosophy in the years before WW II He sets the stage for the discussion by giving the broad philosophical background that produced it He discusses the thought of Cassirer and Heidegger in the years that led up to the debate and their writings in the years which followed He discusses the impact on the debate on other philosophers including Leo Strauss Jurgen Habermas and Emannuel LevinasThe debate took place in 1929 on the cusp of Nazism In 1933 Heidegger infamously declared his allegiance to Nazism and became the rector at Freiburg Cassirer was forced to leave Germany and ultimately settled in the United States Inevitably the debate at Davos became politicized in philosophical memory A major aim of Gordon's study is to depoliticize the debate and to try to understand the disagreements between Cassirer and Heidegger in philosophical terms Gordon argues that philosophical disagreements have meaning in their own right and are not mere metaphors or fronts for politics This is an important conclusion philosophically and historicallyGordon's primary aim is for an exposition of the philosophical positions at stake coupled with analysis to help clarify the positions including their broad divergencies and their limited commonalities Gordon states that he began the study with a ualified partial admiration for Heidegger but became increasingly sympathetic towards Cassirer as the study proceeded Gordon declines to decide which protagonist was nearly correct in his position or who won the debate at Davos The issues and positions of both philosophers continue to be discussed In his conclusion Gordon writes one is tempted to ask whether a true resolution of this conflict is at all likely or even possible For in fact these two philosophical principles throwness and spontaneity mark the opposing facets of a conceptual divide the very persistence of which might be understood as the historical predicament of philosophy itself To force its resolution or to foreclose prematurely upon its continued debate would be to deny what may very well be an essential tension of the human conditionGordon has written a difficult thoughtful work of philosophy in its own right The book will be of most benefit to readers steeped in philosophy and with an interest in philosophical uestions particularly as derived from KantRobin Friedman